![]() ![]() There are some good technical reasons why this is unlikely to be implemented. of the dual mono clips on the stereo clip. You're not generating new stereo clips you're replacing the dual mono clips with the equivalent stereo clips, and you want top keep the effects etc. This is the main reason why I don't use mixdowns.Īvid could extend the mixdown parameters in order to meet this paricular need: to preserve every original media, edit, effect, plug-in, mix and every other kind of operation I might be overlooking, generating an editable stereo track. In order to do that, which is what I want, I need to access the original media and operations (edits, effects, mixes) I performed on them. I can't tweak the components of a mixdown, only the mixdown itself. On the other hand, if you need to keep track and control (ex: trimming a clip, remove an effect or do a remix), using the method I linked in my previous post, you still can manipulate the original media, instead of a mixdown which, as the name implies, generates a new clip with new media files, according to the edits, effects and mixes of the mono tracks. You loose the every cut, every effect, every plug-in, volume and pan controls of the original media and pretty much everything you could do with the original 2 mono tracks. It's true that you do, in fact, get a stereo audio track with everithing included, but it's not editable. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |